<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The National Crisis in Minority Media Ownership</title>
	<link>http://www.stopbigmedia.com/blog/2007/09/26/the-national-crisis-in-minority-media-ownership/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 04:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: thursdayinjune</title>
		<link>http://www.stopbigmedia.com/blog/2007/09/26/the-national-crisis-in-minority-media-ownership/#comment-12359</link>
		<dc:creator>thursdayinjune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 21:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.stopbigmedia.com/blog/2007/09/26/the-national-crisis-in-minority-media-ownership/#comment-12359</guid>
		<description>While there are many things that need to be done to ensure more diversity in media ownership, one easy step Congress can take to ensure there are more diverse voices represented on the air is to allow for the license of more low power FM community radio stations. LPFM is all about localism, diversity, and a focus on programming, from public affairs to music, that too often is absent in the corporate media.

Representative Solis, I hope you will work to encourage your colleagues to support HR 2802, the Local Community Radio Act. This bill would expand LPFM beyond the limited areas it is restricted to now, opening up new licensing opportunities for groups operating in larger communities, and ensuring more voices are heard.

Shawn Campbell
Founder, Chicago Independent Radio Project</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While there are many things that need to be done to ensure more diversity in media ownership, one easy step Congress can take to ensure there are more diverse voices represented on the air is to allow for the license of more low power FM community radio stations. LPFM is all about localism, diversity, and a focus on programming, from public affairs to music, that too often is absent in the corporate media.</p>
<p>Representative Solis, I hope you will work to encourage your colleagues to support HR 2802, the Local Community Radio Act. This bill would expand LPFM beyond the limited areas it is restricted to now, opening up new licensing opportunities for groups operating in larger communities, and ensuring more voices are heard.</p>
<p>Shawn Campbell<br />
Founder, Chicago Independent Radio Project</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jstearns</title>
		<link>http://www.stopbigmedia.com/blog/2007/09/26/the-national-crisis-in-minority-media-ownership/#comment-12357</link>
		<dc:creator>jstearns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.stopbigmedia.com/blog/2007/09/26/the-national-crisis-in-minority-media-ownership/#comment-12357</guid>
		<description>Dear Rep. Solis,

Thanks for coming to this forum to connect with the public and listen to their concerns.

I was at the Chicago hearing when Commissioner Adelstein proposed the idea of an independent panel to study the impact of media consolidation on minority ownership, and applaud him for his leadership and thank you for your support of this panel.

While in Chicago I had the good fortune to travel to number of communities across the city, and at the hearing I listened carefully as small business owners, faith leaders, publishers, students, mothers, hip hop artists, and many others said over and over again - media is a life and death issue. I was struck by this resounding message.

In communities, on the ground, media is not just about news and entertainment, it is a public health issue, a public safety issue, and an issue that reaches across all communities.

For too long, media has been considered by many, as just another business. If media is indeed a matter of life and death, not just a business, how should Congress respond to address this public health concern?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Rep. Solis,</p>
<p>Thanks for coming to this forum to connect with the public and listen to their concerns.</p>
<p>I was at the Chicago hearing when Commissioner Adelstein proposed the idea of an independent panel to study the impact of media consolidation on minority ownership, and applaud him for his leadership and thank you for your support of this panel.</p>
<p>While in Chicago I had the good fortune to travel to number of communities across the city, and at the hearing I listened carefully as small business owners, faith leaders, publishers, students, mothers, hip hop artists, and many others said over and over again - media is a life and death issue. I was struck by this resounding message.</p>
<p>In communities, on the ground, media is not just about news and entertainment, it is a public health issue, a public safety issue, and an issue that reaches across all communities.</p>
<p>For too long, media has been considered by many, as just another business. If media is indeed a matter of life and death, not just a business, how should Congress respond to address this public health concern?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arturo Bandini</title>
		<link>http://www.stopbigmedia.com/blog/2007/09/26/the-national-crisis-in-minority-media-ownership/#comment-12352</link>
		<dc:creator>Arturo Bandini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.stopbigmedia.com/blog/2007/09/26/the-national-crisis-in-minority-media-ownership/#comment-12352</guid>
		<description>Dear Rep. Solis,

Thank you for writing the letter to Chairman Martin and thank you for taking the time to speak to the activist community here at StopBigMedia.com.

It seems to me that the FCC is headed down a path towards allowing more local media consolidation, much as they did in 2003.  Back then that effort was fortunately stopped by a combination of public outrage, bi-partisan outrage in Congress, and ultimately by the court's decision to remand the rules.

It appears that Chairman Martin is doing his best to keep up appearances -- so as not to repeat all the mistakes of his predecessor Michael Powell -- but that he will move to give the Big Media Companies what they want.

My question is then, why doesn't Congress step in now, before the damage is done?  Wouldn't it send a very strong message to the FCC if the Congress passed a resolution ordering the FCC to address minority ownership prior to making any further deregulation?  It seems that all the data indicates that the best way to increase minority/female ownership is to reduce the massive amounts of broadcast media consolidation, freeing up stations that new minority and women owned companies can purchase (helped perhaps by a Congressional reinstatement of the tax certificate program).

I think given the level of bipartisan outrage expressed by the Republican-controlled 2003 Congress that mustering up votes for such action in this 2007 Congress would be much easier.

Thanks again for your work in this important area.

---Arturo Bandini</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Rep. Solis,</p>
<p>Thank you for writing the letter to Chairman Martin and thank you for taking the time to speak to the activist community here at StopBigMedia.com.</p>
<p>It seems to me that the FCC is headed down a path towards allowing more local media consolidation, much as they did in 2003.  Back then that effort was fortunately stopped by a combination of public outrage, bi-partisan outrage in Congress, and ultimately by the court&#8217;s decision to remand the rules.</p>
<p>It appears that Chairman Martin is doing his best to keep up appearances &#8212; so as not to repeat all the mistakes of his predecessor Michael Powell &#8212; but that he will move to give the Big Media Companies what they want.</p>
<p>My question is then, why doesn&#8217;t Congress step in now, before the damage is done?  Wouldn&#8217;t it send a very strong message to the FCC if the Congress passed a resolution ordering the FCC to address minority ownership prior to making any further deregulation?  It seems that all the data indicates that the best way to increase minority/female ownership is to reduce the massive amounts of broadcast media consolidation, freeing up stations that new minority and women owned companies can purchase (helped perhaps by a Congressional reinstatement of the tax certificate program).</p>
<p>I think given the level of bipartisan outrage expressed by the Republican-controlled 2003 Congress that mustering up votes for such action in this 2007 Congress would be much easier.</p>
<p>Thanks again for your work in this important area.</p>
<p>&#8212;Arturo Bandini</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tkarr</title>
		<link>http://www.stopbigmedia.com/blog/2007/09/26/the-national-crisis-in-minority-media-ownership/#comment-12351</link>
		<dc:creator>tkarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.stopbigmedia.com/blog/2007/09/26/the-national-crisis-in-minority-media-ownership/#comment-12351</guid>
		<description>Thank you Representative Solis for taking the time to address this important issue. I have one question for you: As the FCC has failed dismally to protect diversity over the airwaves, what more can Congress do to put this issue on the front burner and ensure that our airwaves truly reflect the needs of all Americans?

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Representative Solis for taking the time to address this important issue. I have one question for you: As the FCC has failed dismally to protect diversity over the airwaves, what more can Congress do to put this issue on the front burner and ensure that our airwaves truly reflect the needs of all Americans?</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
